SGcables.com! All cables in one place !

IEC 60228 (Conductors)

IEC 60228 (Conductors)

IEC 60228 conductors are defined under the IEC 60228:2023 standard, which specifies the nominal cross-sectional areas for conductors used in electric power cables and cords, ranging from 0.5 mm² to 3,500 mm². This standard applies to various types of IEC 60228 conductors, including solid, stranded, and Milliken conductors made from copper, aluminum, and aluminum alloys. It also includes flexible copper IEC 60228 conductors designed for fixed cable installations. However, the IEC 60228 standard for conductors does not cover applications intended for telecommunication purposes.

IEC 60228 (Conductors)

1. Why IEC 60228 matters

Inside every power, control, or data cable are IEC 60228 conductors, which determine how much current can flow, how much heat is generated, and how long the cable will last. The IEC 60228 standard, titled “Conductors of insulated cables”, is the foundational document specifying how IEC 60228 conductors must be constructed and the direct-current (d.c.) resistance they must meet at 20 °C. Recognized globally, this standard for IEC 60228 conductors is referenced by nearly every major cable regulation, including IEC 60502, IEC 60332, EN 50575/CPR, BS 6724, and NF C 32-322. As a result, a single certification for IEC 60228 conductors allows cable specifiers to source compliant cables internationally without needing to retest under local conductor standards.

2. Scope in one sentence

IEC 60228 conductors, as defined in the IEC 60228:2023 standard, include solid, stranded, flexible, and extra-flexible types made from copper, aluminium, or aluminium alloy. These IEC 60228 conductors are manufactured in cross-sectional areas ranging from 0.5 mm² to 3,500 mm² and are commonly used in power and control cables for both fixed and flexible installations. The standard for IEC 60228 conductors ensures consistent performance across various cable applications. However, IEC 60228 conductors do not cover use in telecommunication, RF systems, or bare overhead conductors.

3. Edition history & what changed in 2023

Edition Year Key changes
1st 1968 First alignment of metric cross-sections and resistance values.
2nd 1978 Added aluminium and tinned copper resistance tables.
3rd 2004 (still cited by many national specs) Introduced Class 5 and Class 6 flexibility definitions.
4th 2023 • Extended nominal areas to 3 500 mm² 
• Added Milliken sector conductors 
• Tightened resistance tolerances for
aluminium-magnesium-silicon alloys 
• Clarified test‐equipment accuracy (ref IECEE OD-5014).
cdn.standards.iteh.aicdn.standards.iteh.ai

Always specify the edition year when referencing IEC 60228 conductors on drawings and RFQs—for example, “IEC 60228:2023 Class 2 Cu conductors”—to ensure you receive IEC 60228 conductors built to the latest standards, avoiding outdated 2004 tolerances with looser requirements.

4. Conductor classes – the heart of the standard

Class Typical construction Flexibility index* Typical cable types
1 – Solid Single, round or sector copper/aluminium wire Building wires (H07V-U), transformer windings
2 – Stranded 7, 19, 37, 61 or 127 wires, compacted or non-compacted ★★ LV & MV power cables (IEC 60502-1/-2), control cables
5 – Flexible Very fine strands ≤ 0.21 mm for 0.5–6 mm²; ≤ 0.41 mm above
6 mm²
★★★★ H05VV-F cords, drag-chain automation cables
6 – Extra flexible Finer strands (≤ 0.16 mm up to 4 mm²; ≤ 0.25 mm above) ★★★★★ Welding leads, speaker cables, robotics dress-packs

*Higher stars = greater strand count → smaller wire Ø → tighter bend radius allowed. 

Milliken and segmental conductors (used above 1 000 mm² to cut skin-effect losses) are now explicitly recognised as Class 2 variants provided each sector meets the strand rule. 

5. Resistance tables – the compliance benchmark

IEC 60228 defines maximum d.c. resistance values per kilometre at 20 °C for each material and class. Excerpt (plain copper):
Nominal area (mm²) Class 1/2 (Ω /km) Class 5 (Ω /km) Class 6 (Ω /km)
1.5 12.1 13.3 13.7
10 1.83 1.91 1.94
120 0.153 0.158 0.161

Values factor in strand lay-length and contact resistance; manufacturers must not exceed them after compaction or tinning. 

Why it matters:

Compliance is checked by a 4-wire Kelvin measurement with Class 0.5 instrumentation (clause 7.2).

6. Material options and treatments

Material Resistivity ρ (20 °C) Notes
Annealed copper 1.724 µΩ cm (the reference) Preferred for class 5/6 because of ductility.
Tinned copper +2 % resistance allowance Tin eases soldering and slows corrosion in LSZH cables.
Aluminium (1xxx) 2.826 µΩ cm 48 % lighter than Cu; needs larger cross-section.
Al-Mg-Si alloy 3.086 µΩ cm (tightened in 2023) Higher strength for overhead style cores in hybrid cables.
Silver, nickel or composite coatings are allowed but must meet the base-metal resistance rows.

7. Manufacturing tolerances & checks

Clause Test Acceptance criteria
6.2 Number & diameter of wires Micrometer on 10 % sample strands; each Ø within +/- 3 %.
6.4 Overall conductor diameter Within ±5 % of tabulated max.
7.2 d.c. resistance ≤ table value after any compaction & heat treatment.
7.3 Tensile test on individual wires Cu: ≥ 200 MPa Rm; Al: ≥ 125 MPa.
7.4 Elongation Cu ≥ 20 % (1 & 2); Cu ≥ 15 % (5 & 6); Al ≥ 4 %.
7.5 Hot set (for tinned copper) ≤ 10 % set at 150 °C, 20 N cm-².

Factories run routine resistance checks on every reel, while tensile/elongation are sample tests per production lot. 

8. How IEC 60228 plugs into the bigger cable rulebook

9. Comparing IEC 60228 metric sizes with AWG/MCM

IEC size (mm²) Nearest AWG Resistance Cu Ω/km (IEC) Difference vs IEC limit
2.5 14 7.35 AWG table gives 8.29 Ω/km →
worse (⚠ higher loss)
16 6 1.15 AWG 6 = 1.31 Ω/km → still higher
95 3/0 0.193 AWG 3/0 = 0.206 Ω/km → close
Thus importing AWG-based cable into IEC markets can breach resistance limits even if nominal ampacity looks acceptable.

10. Specifiers’ mini-guide (print & pin)

11. Emerging trends & likely future amendments

11. Emerging trends & likely future amendments

Yes, the standard allows mixed classes provided each core meets its own resistance row and overall lay remains symmetrical.

Tin adds ≈ 2 % resistance—already factored into the tinned-copper rows—so derating is not required if tables are met.

IEC 60228 sets maximum resistance; compaction is optional unless another standard (e.g., IEC 60502 for 35 kV) requires it to control electric-field stress.

Conclusion

IEC 60228 gives the electrical world a single, crystal-clear language for conductors—defining classes, dimensions, materials and above all the maximum d.c. resistance each cross-section may show at 20 °C. Without it, every other cable standard, from fire performance to ampacity, would lose its common reference point. By citing the latest 2023 edition, choosing the right class for mechanical flexibility, and verifying resistance against Table 1, engineers and purchasing teams can guarantee that the cables they install—from tiny sensor leads to 3 000 mm² utility feeders—deliver the efficiency, reliability and 30-year service life that modern infrastructure demands.